Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15425 (PNJ)

BHUPIDER PAL SINGH v. REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/1967/2025 · 2025-02-03

Deepak Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

132 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1967-2025 Date of Decision: February 03, 2025 Sh. Bhupinder Pal Singh …Pe44oner Versus Registrar Coopera ve Socie es and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Harjot Singh Bedi, Advocate for the pe oner. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) Present pe on has been filed under Ar cles 226/227 of the Cons tu on of India praying for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus direc ng the respondents to release the arrears of revised pay/pension of the pe oner from 01.07.2021 to 31.07.2022 and arrears of other pensionary benefits on account of revised pay from 01.07.2021 to 31.07.2022 along with interest at the rate of 18% w.e.f. 01.07.2021 ll realiza on of the same on the basis of implementa on of Sixth Pay Commission implemented w.e.f. 01.01.2016 by the respondent No.2-Department of Finance, Government of Punjab. 2. Learned counsel for the pe oner submits that the pe oner has re red from service on a7aining the age of superannua on prior to 31.07.2022. However, his arrears of revised pay/pension and other re ral benefits w.e.f. 01.07.2021 to 31.07.2022 based on the recommenda ons of the Sixth Pay Commission have not been paid. Learned counsel submits that at this stage, pe oner would be sa sfied, if the legal no ce dated 21.10.2024 (Annexure P-7) is considered and decided by passing a speaking order in a me-bound frame. 3. No ce of mo on. 4. Mr. Rajesh Sehgal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts no ce on behalf of respondent No.1-State and Mr. T.S. Sidhu, Advocate accepts no ce on behalf of respondent No.2 and 4 and both of the counsel have no objec on to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the pe oner. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the par es and have gone through the record of the case. Sarita Rani 2025.02.03 18:22 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order CWP-1967-2025 - 2 - 2025:PHHC:015145 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case or the claim being made by the pe oner in the present pe on, respondent No.3 is directed to consider and decide the claim made by the pe oner in legal no ce dated 21.10.2024 (Annexure P-7) in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of cer fied copy of this order. In case, the pe oner is found en tled, necessary benefits be released to him within a period of three months therea?er. The pe on stands disposed of. February 03, 2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Sarita Rani 2025.02.03 18:22 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order