BHUPIDER PAL SINGH v. REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CWP/1967/2025 · 2025-02-03
Deepak Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15425 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15425 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
132 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1967-2025 Date of Decision: February 03, 2025 Sh. Bhupinder Pal Singh …Pe44oner Versus Registrar Coopera
ve Socie
es and others …Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. Harjot Singh Bedi, Advocate for the pe
oner.
DEEPAK GUPTA
, J.(Oral)
Present pe
on has been filed under Ar
cles 226/227 of the Cons
tu
on of India praying for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus direc
ng the respondents to release the arrears of revised pay/pension of the pe
oner from 01.07.2021 to 31.07.2022 and arrears of other pensionary benefits on account of revised pay from 01.07.2021 to 31.07.2022 along with interest at the rate of 18% w.e.f. 01.07.2021
ll realiza
on of the same on the basis of implementa
on of Sixth Pay Commission implemented w.e.f. 01.01.2016 by the respondent No.2-Department of Finance, Government of Punjab.
2.
Learned counsel for the pe
oner submits that the pe
oner has re
red from service on a7aining the age of superannua
on prior to 31.07.2022. However, his arrears of revised pay/pension and other re
ral benefits w.e.f. 01.07.2021 to 31.07.2022 based on the recommenda
ons of the Sixth Pay Commission have not been paid. Learned counsel submits that at this stage, pe
oner would be sa
sfied, if the legal no
ce dated 21.10.2024 (Annexure P-7) is considered and decided by passing a speaking order in a
me-bound frame.
3. No
ce of mo
on.
4. Mr. Rajesh Sehgal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts no
ce on behalf of respondent No.1-State and Mr. T.S. Sidhu, Advocate accepts no
ce on behalf of respondent No.2 and 4 and both of the counsel have no objec
on to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the pe
oner.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the par
es and have gone through the record of the case. Sarita Rani 2025.02.03 18:22 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order
CWP-1967-2025 - 2 - 2025:PHHC:015145
6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case or the claim being made by the pe
oner in the present pe
on, respondent No.3 is
directed to consider and decide the claim made by the pe
oner in legal no
ce dated 21.10.2024 (Annexure P-7) in accordance with law, by passing a speaking
order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of cer
fied copy of this order. In case, the pe
oner is found en
tled, necessary benefits be released to him within a period of three months therea?er. The pe
on stands disposed of. February 03, 2025
(DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita
JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No
Sarita Rani 2025.02.03 18:22 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order