RAKESH KUMAR SHUKLA v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE F.T.C. SITAPUR AND 2 OTHERS
/4020/2023 · 2025-01-27
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154241 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154241 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:5261 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4020 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Shukla Respondent :- Additional District Judge F.T.C. Sitapur And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Munni Lal Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- Digvijay Singh,Digvijay Singh,Shashwat Srivastava, Surya Prakash Tiwari Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. C.M. Application No. IA/3 of 2024 An application for substitution has been filed on account of the death of the sole petitioner. The substitution application is allowed. Let necessary substitution be carried out in the array of the parties.
Order Date :- 27.1.2025 Arun
Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4020 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rakesh Kumar Shukla Respondent :- Additional District Judge F.T.C. Sitapur And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Munni Lal Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- Digvijay Singh,Digvijay Singh,Shashwat Srivastava,Surya Prakash Tiwari Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 15.05.2023 whereby the application for amending the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 at the appellate stage was rejected.
3. The appellate Court has considered that the amendment sought cannot be held to be typographical errors. He further held that stand taken that there was a confusion created cannot be accepted. In any case, the order impugned is an interlocutory order warranting no interference at this stage. The petitioner would be at liberty to challenge the order dated 15.05.2023 also after the decision of the appeal, in case any second appeal is preferred by the petitioner.
4. The petition stands disposed of.
5. This order has been passed in the presence of Sri Shashwat Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3.
Order Date :- 27.1.2025 Arun Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench