Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010146832023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1926/2023 SMTI IBEMHAL SINGHA W/O LATE KUNJAMONI SINGHA, C/O AKRAM ALI, VILL AND P.O.- BANSKANDI, P.S.-LAKHIPUR, DIST-CACHAR, ASSAM VERSUS IRABAT SINGHA AND ORS. (SON) 2:BHAGIRATHA SINGHA (SON) 3:LATE BRAJENDRA SINGHA (SON) 3.1:MOTI MUBI SINGHA W/O LATE BRAJENDRA SINGHA 3.2:PREMJIT SINGHA S/O LATE BRAJENDRA SINGHA 3.3:PREMILA DEVI D/O LATE BRAJENDRA SINGHA 3.4:PREMODA DEVI D/O LATE BRAJENDRA SINGHA. ALL ARE R/O NIJ-BANSKANDI PART-III P.O.- BANSKANDI PARGONA- BANSKANDI P.S.-LAKHIPUR SUB-DIVISION- LAKHIPUR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM 4:SURENDRA KUMAR SINGHA Page No.# 2/3 (SON) 5:NARENDRA SINGHA (SON) 6:SMTI BHAIGYABATI SINGHA (DAUGHTER) 7:SMTI NIRUPA SINGHA (DAUGHTER) 8:SMTI NIRALA SINGHA (DAUGHTER) 9:SMTI TOMPHA DEVI (WIDOW) OF LATE IBOTON SINGHA AND ALL ARE R/O VILL AND P.O.- BANSKANDI P.S.-LAKHIPUR DIST- CACHAR ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D MAZUMDER, MS D DEVI,MR. S BISWAS Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D CHAKRABARTY, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 26.05 . 2025 Heard Ms. D. Devi, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. D. Chakraborty, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 and 8. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condoning the delay of 188 days in filing the connected substitution petition. The grounds for delay have been properly explained in paragraph 4 of this application. On perusal of the grounds for delay in the said paragraph, this court is of the view that the applicant was prevented by a sufficient cause for not filing the Page No.# 3/3 substitution petition within the stipulated period of time. The learned counsel for the respondents has no objection for allowing the delay. In view of the above, the delay of 188 days in preferring the connected substitution petition is hereby condone. With the above direction, the I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant