DEEPAK KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/8259/2025 · 2025-07-29
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154239 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154239 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43561 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8259 of 2025 Petitioner :- Deepak Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to consider petitioner's transfer from District Bareilly either to Lucknow or in an adjoining district in view of the fact that petitioner's wife is also in Government Employment at Lucknow. He, therefore, requests couple posting.
3. With regard to aforesaid grievance, petitioner has already submitted a representation dated 26.05.2025.
4. At present learned counsel for petitioner restricts his prayer for a final decision with regard to same.
5. Considering innocuous prayer being made by learned counsel for petitioner and without entering into the merits of the case, opposite party No.2 i.e. Chairman of the Board of Revenue, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow is directed to consider and decide representation dated 26.05.2025 within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before said authority. Petitioner shall annex a copy of representation dated 26.05.2025 alongwith certified copy of this order.
6. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 29.7.2025 Satish Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench