1 2025:CGHC:35675 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2604 of 2021  Akhilesh Singh Parihar S/o Shri Surendra Singh Parihar Aged About 40 Years Occupation Service , Presently Posted As District Coordinator, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Commerce And Industries, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur, Atal Nagar District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. Union Of India Through The Secretory, Department Of Personnel And Training , North Block, Central Secretariat, New Delhi, Delhi 110001. 3. State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Department Of Commerce And Industries, Vallabh Bhawan, Arera Hills, Bhopal Madhya Pradesh. 4. Center For Entrepreneur Development Of Madhya Pradesh (CEDMAP) A Society Registered Under Society Registration Act 1973 Of Erstwhile State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Its Executive Director , 16 A Arera Hills , Bhopal Madhya Pradesh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Navneet Kumar Yadav, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Akath Kumar Yadav, Advocate For State : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 24. 07.2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has sought the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the Order dated Order dated 05/02/2021, bearing no. CEDMAP/EDS/307, passed by Passed by respondent no.4. SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.07.24 14:14:03 +0530 2 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to initiate proceedings for division of assets and liabilities of the CEDMAP, and further to constitute the CGCED. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to further direct the respondents to regularize the petitioner in the service. 10.4 Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner. 10.5 Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 2. Notice, Annexure P/1 dated 05.02.2021 was issued to the petitioner with regard to discontinuation of contract dated 01.05.2018. It is also indicated that the last working day of the petitioner was 6th March, 2021 and the petitioner was directed to hand over records, bills, program reports etc. to the Regional Coordinator before 6th March, 2021 for final settlement. 3. No interim order was passed in favour of the petitioner and it appears that the order Annexure P/1 dated 05.02.2021 would have been executed, accordingly this petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive his prayer, if cause of action still subsists. 4. With the aforesaid observation(s), the instant petition is hereby disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant