Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44439 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 856 of 2025 Applicant :- Anwaruddin @ Raju And 7 Others Opposite Party :- The State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Addl. Secy. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rishabh Chauhan,Atul Krishna,Praveen Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Rishabh Chauhan, the learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Satyendra Srivastava, the learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Suyagaya Pandey, the learned counsel for opposite party No.2 and perused the record. A short counter affidavit has been filed by the opposite party No.2, which is taken on record. 2. By means of the instant application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C./528 B.N.S.S., the applicants have sought quashing of the charge-sheet dated 23.11.2024, summoning order dated 30.11.2024 passed by learned Additional District and Session Judge-I, Unnao as well as the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 2067 of 2024 arising out of the Case Crime No. 274 of 2024 under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 352, 111 B.N.S. and 3/5/21/23 BUDS Act, 2019 relating to Police Station- Bangarmau, District Unnao on the basis of compromise entered into between the parties. 3. Learned counsels for the parties submit that they have settled their dispute amicably outside the Court and they have arrived at the compromise. Compromise entered into between the parties have been placed on record as Annexure-4 to the petition. The parties have confirmed the terms of the compromise. 4. Opposite party No.2 does not have any objection, if the impugned proceedings are quashed against the applicants. 5. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. 6. Considering the fact that the dispute between the parties is personal in nature and ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of B. S. Joshi and others versus State of Haryana and another :(2003) 4 SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant versus C.B.I. and another : (2008) 9 SCC 677, Manoj Sharma versus State and others : (2008) 16 SCC 1, Gian Singh versus Station of Punjab: (2010) 15 SCC 118 and Narinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another: (2014) 6 SCC 466, it would be appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the case to quash the criminal proceedings as continuance of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. 7. 7. In view of the fact that the parties have settled their dispute outside the Court by way of compromise arrived at between the parties and law laid down by the Supreme Court of India, the present application is allowed and the charge-sheet dated 23.11.2024, summoning order dated 30.11.2024 passed by learned Additional District and Session Judge-I, Unnao as well as the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 2067 of 2024 arising out of the Case Crime No. 274 of 2024 under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 352, 111 B.N.S. and 3/5/21/23 BUDS Act, 2019 relating to Police Station- Bangarmau, District Unnao are quashed. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 31.7.2025 Preeti. Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench