Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15420 (RAJ)

SHRIRAM @ PINTU S/O MAHAKIRAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5119/2025 · 2025-05-12

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:19784] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5119/2025 Shriram @ Pintu S/o Mahakiram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Aam Ka Jahara, At Present Resident Of Khuda Chainpur, Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli (Raj.) (At Present In Sub Jail Hindaun City, Karauli). ----Applicant Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Mahendra Meena, Adv. For Respondent : Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 12/05/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S, 2023 against the order dated 02.04.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge No.1, Hindaun City, District Karauli in Bail Application No.152/2025 arising out of FIR No.45/2014, registered at Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of IPC by which the bail application of the accused-applicant under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel also submits that in this matter, charges levelled against the accused-applicant are for the offences punishable [2025:RJ-JP:19784] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5119/2025] under Sections 379 and 411 of IPC and the same are triable by Magistrate. Learned counsel further submits that the accused- applicant was directed to appear before learned trial Court on 09.12.2015, however, he could not appear before the learned trial Court because of the nature of his vocation (Majdoor) and therefore, declaring the accused-applicant to be an absconder, warrant of arrest has been issued and his bail bonds were forfeited. The accused-applicant was arrested on 24.03.2025, and since then, he is behind the bars, therefore, the accused-applicant be granted benefit of bail. 3. Learned Deputy Government Advocate vehemently opposes this bail application and submits that the accused-applicant has remained absent for nine years and another case of similar nature has been registered against the accused-applicant, therefore, he is not entitled for indulgence in this bail application. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the period of custody of the accused-applicant and also considering the fact that the charges levelled against the accused-applicant are triable by Magistrate, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed by the applicant. 6. Consequently, this bail application filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that accused-applicant Shriram @ Pintu S/o Mahakiram, arrested in connection with [2025:RJ-JP:19784] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5119/2025] FIR No.45/2014, registered at Police Station Nadoti, District Karauli shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Applicant shall be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /151