Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15418 (JHR)

THE SOCIETY OF DIVINE SAVIOUR, THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FATHER. AVIRAL KUMAR MINJ v. THE RANCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH THE ADMINISTRATOR CUM COMMISSIONER

WPC/4248/2025 · 2025-08-13

Rajesh Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:23550 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.4248 of 2025 ---- The Soceity of Divine Saviour, Kanke Road, Ranchi through its authorized representative Parish Prist namely, father, Aviral Kumar Minj, aged about 32 years, C/o Agastus Pandul, R/o Village-Gholeng, P.O Gholeng, P.S-Gholeng, District-Jashpur, Chhattisgarh …. …. Petitioner -Versus- 1. The Ranchi Municipal Corporation through the Administrator cum Commissioner, Ranchi Municipal Corporation, P.O. + P.S. Ranchi, District- Ranchi. 2. Afrem George Kujur, S/o- Norbert Kujur, aged about Not Known, R/o- Church Galli, Opposite to New Hot Lips, Kanke Road, P.O. Ranchi University, P.S- Kanke, District- Ranchi. 3. Mamta Elizabeth Lakra, W/o- Jaydeep Kacchap, aged About Not Known, R/o- Kanke Road, Bhitha, Ρ.Ο. Ranchi University, P.S. Kanke, District-Ranchi. 4. Laal Toppo, S/o- Not Known, aged About- Not Known, R/o- Kanke Road, Bhitha, P.O. Ranchi University, P.S.- Kanke, District- Ranch …. …. Respondents ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Navneet Toppo, Advocate For the Respondent-RMC : Mrs. Vandana Singh, Adv. ---- 02/Dated: 13th August, 2025 1. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that after filing of the present writ petition, certain developments have taken place and as such, he has instruction from his client to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to pursue his remedy in accordance with law. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-RMC has raised no objection. 3. In view of the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, present writ petition is hereby, disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 4. Pending, interlocutory application, if any, also stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Raja/- Uploaded