SUBASH CHANDRA SON OF HARI SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
WRW/113/2024 · 2025-02-14
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Sameer Jain
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15416 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15416 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Misc. Review Petition No. 113/2024
1. Subash Chandra Son Of Hari Singh, Aged About 29 Years, Resident Of Village Partapura Post Khuri Bari Tehsil Laxmangarh District Sikar Rajasthan Pin Code - 332315
2. Tripati Bhai Bhedi D/o Ramavatar, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of 222 Mansarovar Colony, Kala Kuan Alwar, Rajasthan 303012
3. Pratap Singh son Of Jai Singh, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Ghalib Syed Outside Delhi Gate Alwar District Alwar Rajasthan 301001 Disable Candidate
4. Ashok Kumar Son Of Kailash Chand Nagar, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of Dusara Walla Kuan Meena Pari Outside Delhi Gate Alwar District Alwar Rajasthan 301001 ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director Department Of Secondary Education Bikaner Rajasthan
2. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Jaipur Through Its Chairman Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prabhansh Sharma HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 14/02/2025
1. Heard.
2. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant-petitioner, we find that apart from the review petition being hopelessly barred by limitation, there is no error apparent on the face of the record warranting review of the order.
(2 of 2) [WRW-113/2024]
3. The submissions of learned counsel for the applicant- petitioner that in the present case Rule 21 of the Rajasthan Education (State and Subordinate) Service Rules, 2021 (for short ‘the Rules of 2021’) will apply and not Rule 28, was not even raised at the time of argument.
4. Relying upon the provisions contained in Rule 28 of the Rules of 2021, the order of this Court proceeds to dismiss the appeal. Therefore, no case for review is made out.
5. The Review Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ KAMLESH KUMAR-RAHUL/7