RAJAT MISHRA v. SHRI SANJAY TIWARI, BASIC SHIKSHA ADHIKARI DIST. AMETHI
CAPL/2330/2025 · 2025-09-22
Manjive Shukla
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154132 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 154132 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2330 of 2025 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J.
1. Shri Shailendra Singh Rajawat, learned counsel representing opposite party, at the very outset, has submitted that the order passed by the Writ Court has been complied with as the District Basic Education Officer, Amethi vide order dated 20th September 2025 had issued appointment letter in favour of the applicant.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant has submitted that though the appointment letter dated 20th September 2025 had been issued thereby appointing the petitioner on a Class-IV post but he has yet to submit his joining on his post.
3. In view of the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the view that now nothing remains to be decided in this contempt petition.
4. Accordingly, this contempt petition is disposed of.
5. However, if any difficulty is created by the officer concerned in joining of the petitioner-applicant pursuant to the appointment letter dated 20th September 2025, it would remain open for the applicant to file an application for recall of this order. September 22, 2025 Anurag Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Mansoor, Mohammad Danish, Mohd Siddiq Alam Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Shailendra Singh Rajawat (Manjive Shukla,J.) Rajat Mishra .....Applicant(s) Shri Sanjay Tiwari, Basic Shiksha Adhikari Dist. Amethi .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench