Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15413 (JHR)

MD. NASIR ALIAS NASAR v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3010/2025 · 2025-06-05

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:14510 1 | P a g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3010 of 2025 ------ 1. Md. Nasir @ Nasar, aged about 47 years, S/o. Shekh Sarafat; 2. Md. Shamim, aged about 70 years S/o. Late Arajani; 3. Md. Juber Alam @ Juber @ Md. Zubair Alam, aged about 42 years, S/o. Serafuddin; 4. Md. Aslam, aged about 22 years, S/o. Md. Bhutto; 5. Ibrahim, aged about 54 years, S/o. Mansur; 6. Abdul Karim, aged about 49 years, S/o. Gulam Rasul; 7. Md. Mostkim @ Md. Mostakim @ Mustakim, aged about 34 years, S/o. Md. Mansur; 8. Nuja Khatun @ Nuza Khatoon @ Uniza, aged about 39 years, W/o. Md. Bhutto; All are R/o. Vill.- Lougain, P.O.- Lougain, P.S.- Mahagama, Dist.- Godda. … … Petitioners -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ------ For the Petitioners : Mrs. J. Mazumdar, Advocate : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, advocate For the State : Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, Spl.P.P. ------ 02/Dated: 05.06.2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioners have moved before this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail instituted under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 325, 341, 342, 307, 354, 504 & 506 of the I.P.C. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case as alleged in the F.I.R. It has further been submitted that there is case and counter case between the parties. It has finally been submitted that there is no criminal antecedent of any of the petitioners as has been stated in paragraph no. 16 of the anticipatory bail application. 4. Learned Special P.P. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case, I am inclined to extend the 2025:JHHC:14510 2 | P a g e privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C., Godda in connection with Mahgama P.S. Case No. 106/2024 with the condition that they will co- operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhaar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. It is made clear that if the petitioners do not cooperate with the investigation/trial, the State would be at liberty to take appropriate action. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Sandeep-Rahul/-