- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2751 WP No. 36808 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 36808 OF 2015 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI RAMAKRISHNA N N S/O V.NARAYANAPPA SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS 1(A) SRI. N.R. VIRUPAKSHA S/O LATE SRI. RAMAKRISHAN N.N. AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 1(B) SRI. N.R. AMARNATH S/O LATE SRI. RAMAKRISHAN N.N. AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 1(C) SRI. N.R. VINOD S/O LATE SRI. RAMAKRISHAN N.N. AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO. 59, 1ST MAIN, 7TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE -560 095. 2. SMT. PRAMEELA W/O SRI.RAMAKRISHNA.N.N AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/AT NO.59, 1ST MAIN, 7TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE-560095 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. V.R. DATAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR P. PATIL, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2751 WP No. 36808 of 2015 AND: 1. BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE CORPORATION OFFICES, N.R.SQUARE, J.C.ROAD, BANGALORE-560002 BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, CORPORATION OFFICES, N.R.SQUARE, J.C.ROAD, BANGALORE-560002 3. THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, KORAMANGALA RANGE, BANGALORE-560095 4. RUPESH.M.H S/O HANUMANTE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT 682, 8TH B MAIN ROAD, 3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE, BASAVESHWARNAGAR, BANGALORE-560079 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B V MURALIDHAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3) SRI. BHASKAR BABU, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 TO R-3 HEREIN TO DEMOLISH THE ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION PUT UP IN THE SHCEDULE PROPERTY IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONFIRMATION ORDER DTD 09.02.2012 PASSED UNDER SECTION 321(3) OF THE KARNATAKA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ACT 1976 AND THE BUILDING BYE LAWS THEREIN (ANNEXURE-G). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2751 WP No. 36808 of 2015 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing the matter for some time seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition reserving liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum in respect of his entitlement over the property. 2. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn reserving to the petitioners to initiate appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum in respect of his entitlement over the property in question. It is needless to state in the event the petitioners succeeds in the suit, they are also at liberty to revive their claim that the structure that has come up is illegal and would require demolition, as conceded by the Corporation. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE RS