Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154116 (MAD)

The Government of Tamil Nadu v. N.Rajan

REV.APLW(MD)/173/2025 · 2025-08-22

P B Balaji

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.08.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI Rev.Aplw.(MD) No.173 of 2025 and WMP (MD). No. 19121 of 2025 1.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Fort St.George, Chennai. 2.The Principal Secretary/ The Commissioner of Land Reforms, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 3. The Director of Land Reforms, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. 4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sattur, Virudhunagar District. 5.The Tahsildar, Vembakottai Taluk, Virudhunagar District. Petitioner(s) Vs 1.N.Rajan 2.N.Sudanthirarajan 3.R.Dhanalakshmi 4.S.Rethidevi 5.The Tamil Nadu Bhoodan Yagna Board, Represented by its Chairman, Chennai. 6.Mr.Rama Subbu 7.Mr.Muthu Raj Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis PRAYER: This Review Application is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of CPC, to review the entire judgment passed in W.P.(MD). No.5114 of 2024 dated 14.03.2025. For Petitioner(s): : Mr.S.Vinodh, Government Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr.N.Dilipkumar O R D E R This Review Application is filed to review the Judgment passed in W.P. (MD). No.5114 of 2024 dated 14.03.2025. 2. Heard Mr.S.Vinodh, learned Government Advocate appearing for the petitioners and Mr.N.Dilipkumar, learned counsel for the respondents. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners state that the only ground on which the Review filed is that the Competent Authority to pass orders, is the second petitioner in the present Review Application viz., The Principal Secretary/ The Commissioner of Land Reforms, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005. The review is filed only to modify the order with regad to the Authority who is directed to pass the order pursuant to the disposal of the Writ Petition. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 4. Mr.Dilipkumar, learned counsel for the Writ Petitioners/respondents has no objections for the order in the Writ Petition being modified. It is clarified that the order dated 14.03.2025 is modified to the limited extend of direting the 2nd Petitioner/The Principal Secretary/ The Commissioner of Land Reforms, to remove the name Tamil Nadu Bhoodhana Board in Patta No.1401 and and restore the Patta in the name of the Writ Petitioners instead of direction being issued to the Respondents 5 and 6/petitioners 4 and 5. 5. With the above modificatons, this Review Application is disposed of and consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed. No costs. 22.08.2025 rkp To The Tamil Nadu Bhoodan Yagna Board, Represented by its Chairman, Chennai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis P.B.BALAJI, J., rkp Rev.Aplw. (MD)No.173 of 2025 and WMP (MD). No. 19121 of 2025 22.08.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis