Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154116 (ALL)

RAJA RAM v. SRI MANOJ KUMAR SINGH, PRIN. SECY. NAGAR VIKAS, U.P. CIVIL SECRTT., LKO. AND OTHERS

CAPL/3254/2024 · 2025-07-10

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39244 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3254 of 2024 Applicant :- Raja Ram Opposite Party :- Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, Prin. Secy. Nagar Vikas, U.P. Civil Secrtt., Lko. And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Km. Vishwa Mohini,Rajesh Kumar,Vimal Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Prashant Singh Atal,Virendra Singh Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. 1. Heard. 2. The affidavits of compliance filed by the respondent nos.3 & 4 are taken on record. 3. The present contempt application is filed with the prayer to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the writ court's order dated 8.4.2024 passed in Writ A No.1721 of 2022 (S/S) 'Raja Ram Vs. State of U.P. & 3 Ors.'. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that as order passed by the writ Court in Writ A No. 1721 of 2022 is not being complied with by the respondents in letter and spirit, therefore, respondent may be summoned and punished accordingly. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 & 4 submits that in compliance of the directions of the writ court, decision has already been taken on the representation of the applicant vide order dated 30.5.2025 and the aforesaid order passed by the respondent is already challenged by the applicant before the writ court in Writ A No.5364 of 2024 and on 16.7.2024, interim order was passed, thereafter, Special Appeal was preferred against the order dated 16.7.2024 passed by the writ court. He further submits that as order dated 8.4.2024 passed by the writ court has already been complied with, therefore, no contempt is made out. 6. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the respondent, going through the contents of the order passed by the writ court as well as decision taken by the competent authority on 30.5.2025 and said order is already challenged by the applicant in Writ A No.5364 of 2024, in such, circumstances, this Court is of the view that no contempt is made out, accordingly, the same is hereby, dismissed. 7. However, it is open to the applicant to take appropriate remedy, if he is feeling aggrieved from the order passed by the respondent. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 GauraV/- Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GAURAV PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench