Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15411 (RAJ)

NARENDRA SINGH RAWAT S/O SHRI PREM SINGH RAWAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/108/2025 · 2025-09-24

Avneesh Jhingan, Baljinder Singh Sandhu

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39322-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 108/2025 Narendra Singh Rawat S/o Shri Prem Singh Rawat, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Ladpura, P.s. Gegal, District Ajmer (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Home Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Rajasthan, Jaipur 3. Superintendent Of Police, District Ajmer 4. S.h.o. Police Station- Gegal, District Ajmer 5. Sho Police Station Khatushyamji, District Sikar 6. Mintu Rawat S/o Ladu Singh Rawat, R/o Ladpura, P.s. Gegal, District Ajmer ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nagendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar Mr. Pavan Kumar, CI SHO Khatushyam Ji Distt. Sikar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU Order 24/09/2025 1. This petition in the nature of Habeas Corpus filed by the petitioner with a prayer that brother of the petitioner (hereinafter as referred to ‘detenue’) (wrongly typed the petitioner being uncle in the last line of the prayer) be produced in the Court. 2. The facts as pleaded are that as per the CCTV camera footage the brother of the petitioner on 01.05.2024 went along with the respondent No.6 on a motorcycle. The brother did not return back and missing person report was submitted on 06.05.2024. On failure to trace the detenue FIR No.39/2025 was [2025:RJ-JP:39322-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-108/2025] registered at Police Station Khatushyam Ji, Sikar. The police authorities find that the case relates to Police Station Gegal and Zero FIR was sent to the concerned police station. There was confusion with regard to jurisdiction of the police station and the present petition was filed that no effective steps are being taken to recover the detenue. 3. Learned GA-cum-AAG on specific instructions submits that the confusion no longer exists and police station Khatushyam ji, Sikar is investigating the matter and steps are being taken. 4. Status report dated 23.09.2025 filed by learned GA-cum-AAG today is taken on record. 5. As per the status report, respondent No.6 underwent a polygraph test and the report is inconclusive. It is further submitted that effective measures are being taken to trace the detenue. 6. Albeit, efforts are being made by the police but the desired result has not been yielded. The petition is disposed of with direction to the Superintendent of Police to personally monitor the investigation of the case on fort nightly basis and the team investigating the matter shall give the status report to the Superintendent of Police every month. 7. In case the petitioner if dissatisfied would be at liberty to approach the Magistrate for supervising of the investigation. 8. In the eventuality of the application being made, the Court concerned shall consider the same in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible in the facts of the case. (BALJINDER SINGH SANDHU),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J RIYA/67