Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15411 (GAU)

MUTLEP MAMUD v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS

WP(C)/4331/2020 · 2025-08-12

Kaushik Goswami

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010145132020 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4331/2020 MUTLEP MAMUD S/O LT. LAL MAMUD, VILL. KAWAIMARI BLOCK NO.10, P.O. NALIGAON, P.S. SARTHEBARI, DIST- BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 10 ORS REP. BY THE L.R. CUM COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, JUDICIAL DEPTT., ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY-6 2:THE JT. L.R. AND JT. SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT CUM CHAIRMAN INTERVIEW BOARD FOR NOTARY PUBLIC DISPUR GHY-6 3:THE DY. L.R. AND DY. SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT ASSAM DISPUR GHY-6 4:THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE BARPETA P.O. AND DIST- BARPETA ASSAM 5:THE PRESIDENT BARPETA BAR ASSOCIATION P.O. AND DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN-78301 Page No.# 2/3 6:THE SECRETARY BARPETA BAR ASSOCIATION P.O. AND DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN- 7:JAYA DAS W/O JAYANTA BAYAN VILL. MAIRAMARA AMTOL P.O. AND P.S. HOWLY DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781316 8:JYOTI AGARWALA W/O MUKESH CHACHAN R/O W/NO.6 P.O. AND P.S. BARPETA ROAD DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781315 9:SANTANU CHOUDHURY S/O LT. MRINAL KANTI CHOUDHURY R/O W/NO.3 P.O. AND P.S. SORBHOG DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781317 10:MRIDUL KUMAR DEKA S/O LT. MANOHARI DEKA VILL. BATIKURIHA P.O. BHELLA P.S. AND DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN-781309 11:KULENDRA TALUKDAR S/O SRI SADANANDA TALUKDAR VILL. GANDHINAGAR P.O. AND P.S. AND DIST- BARPETA ASSAM PIN-78130 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R ALI, Page No.# 3/3 Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR. T J MAHANTA (R-10),MR. P P DUTTA (R- 10),MR. A BORUA (R-10),MS P SARMA (R-10),MS D DAS (R7),MR. B GOGOI (R7),MR. N ALAM (R11),MR. A BORUA (R8, R9),MR. P P DUTTA (R8, R9),MR. T J MAHANTA (R8, R9) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 13.08.2025 None appears for the petitioner on call. Heard Mr. S. A. Bakhtiar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.11 and Mr. T. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.8, 9 and 10. It appears that there was also no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last occasion, i.e., 24.06.2025, when the matter was last called. In view of the consecutive non appearance of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant