Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154102 (ALL)

PRIYANSHU SINGH ALIAS GOLU v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

A482/6119/2025 · 2025-07-29

Subhash Vidyarthi

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43575 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6119 of 2025 Applicant :- Priyanshu Singh Alias Golu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Krishna Kumar Tiwari, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Avishesh Kumar Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the file, including the Annexures attached therewith. 2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C./Section 528 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in three cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submit that it is impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties in each case in which he has been granted bail. The learned counsel further submits that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases. Despite the trial Court granting him bail, the applicant is still in jail inasmuch as the applicant being a poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases, details of which are as under: "i. Case Crime No.177 of 2017, under Section 307 I.P.C. Police Station Subeha, District Barabanki, ii. Case Crime No.180 of 2017, under Section 3/25 Arms Act Police Station Subeha, District Barabanki, and iii. Case Crime No.174 of 2017, under Sections 379, 411 I.P.C. Police Station Subeha, District Barabanki." 4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case which shall be treated to be valid in other two cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. . [Subhash Vidyarthi, J.] Order Date :- 29.7.2025 Ram. Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench