Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1541 (UTT)

SURAJ v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/84/2025 · 2025-06-20

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:5215 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS ABA No.1190 of 2025 with ABA No.84 of 2025 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Shariq Khurshid, Advocate, holding brief of Ms. Lubhna Jahan, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Deepak Bisht, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that these Anticipatory Bail Applications have rendered infructuous, inasmuch as, applicants are in judicial custody. 3. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Applications are dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (Alok Mahra, J.) 20.06.2025 Arpan ARPAN JAISWAL Digitally signed by ARPAN JAISWAL DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=eabb68a3895e41937c266c23964c0485365445e3a20dddb73933 98f9fe45ba3e, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=060FC17022BEAE3DE215D68D9D454C5109CB987446351E 4DF04AADAA2C2CEA66, cn=ARPAN JAISWAL Date: 2025.06.23 09:51:58 +05'30'