Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15409 (RAJ)

GOPAL DAS S/O SHRI GULAB CHAND NAREDI v. SMT. KANTA DEVI SABU W/O SHRI GORDHANDAS SABU

CW/7083/2025 · 2025-07-02

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:24273] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7083/2025 Gopal Das S/o Shri Gulab Chand Naredi, Aged About 73 Years, Shopkeeper Shop No. 2197, Gandhi Market, Gangauri Bazar, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Kanta Devi Sabu W/o Shri Gordhandas Sabu, Aged About 76 Years, Resident Of House No. 97, Dinanath Ji Ki Gali, Chandpole Market, Jaipur (Raj.) 1/1. Kamal Kishore Sabu S/o Late Shri Gorhan Das Sabu, Aged About 66 Years, Resident Of House No. 97, Dinanath Ji Ki Gali, Chandpole Market, Jaipur. 1/2. Smt. Neena Sabu, W/o Late Nawal Kishore Sabu, Aged About 54 Years, Resident Of House No. 97, Dinanath Ji Ki Gali, Chandpole Market, Jaipur. 1/3. Nitesh Sabu S/o Late Shri Nawal Kishore Sabu, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of House No. 97, Dinanath Ji Ki Gali, Chandpole Market, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Surya Pratap Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr.M. C. Jain JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 02/07/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been filed against the impugned judgment dated 13.03.2024 passed by the Rent Tribunal, Jaipur Metropolitan-II (for short, ‘the Tribunal’) by which the application filed by the respondents under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 (for short ‘the Act of 2001’) has been allowed and the petitioner has been directed to vacate the rented premises within a period of six months. [2025:RJ-JP:24273] (2 of 3) [CW-7083/2025] 2. Aggrieved by the aforesaid order, the petitioner submitted a statutory appeal before the Appellate Rent Tribunal, however, the same was rejected vide judgment dated 31.01.2025 and the judgment passed by the Rent Tribunal has been upheld. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time, on instructions of his client, has not pressed this petition on its merits. Alternatively, the petitioner prays for granting two years time to vacate the rented premises. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents opposes the prayer made by counsel for the petitioner and submits that the eviction proceedings, in pursuance of the application filed by the respondents remained pending for adjudication before the Rent Tribunal, hence under these circumstances, granting two years more time to the petitioner would be unjustified on the part of respondents. Counsel submits that appropriate suitable time be granted to the petitioner to vacate the premises. 5. In view of the aforesaid submissions made by counsel for the parties, this petition stands disposed of in the following terms:- 1. The petitioner shall be entitled to continue in possession of the suit premises till 30.06.2027, but not beyond that, subject to condition that he will hand over the vacant and peaceful possession of the rented premises to the respondents on or before 30.06.2027. 2. The petitioner shall deposit the arrears of rent, due if any, within a period of three months and shall continue to deposit the double amount of monthly rent, i.e., Rs. 3160/- with the Bank account of the respondents by 15th of each successive month. 3. The petitioner shall not alienate or otherwise create third party right or hand over the possession of the rented premises in question to anyone. [2025:RJ-JP:24273] (3 of 3) [CW-7083/2025] 4. In case the petitioner fails to deposit the rent consecutively for a period of four months, the respondents shall be at liberty to execute the order passed by the Rent Tribunal without further reference to the Court. 6. Further the petitioner shall submit an undertaking on oath incorporating the aforesaid conditions before the Rent Tribunal, Jaipur within a period of four weeks from today. In case, the petitioner fails to submit an undertaking as aforesaid within a period of four weeks from today and / or commits breach of any of the conditions of this order, the respondents shall be entitled to execute the order passed by the Rent Tribunal forthwith and shall obtain the possession of the rented premises in accordance with law. 7. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /84