Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 154084 (ALL)

MEENAKSHI GUPTA v. U.O.I. THRU. SECY. MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS FOOD AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION NEW DELHI AND 6 OTHERS

WRIA/8194/2025 · 2025-07-28

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43361 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8194 of 2025 Petitioner :- Meenakshi Gupta Respondent :- U.O.I. Thru. Secy. Ministry Of Consumer Affairs Food And Public Distribution New Delhi And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prashant Kumar,Devesh Srivastava,Satish Gulati,Shailaja Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Anurag Verma Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Balbir Singh, Advocate who has filed his Vakalatnama today in Court on behalf of the respondent no. 1 which is taken on record and Sri Anurag Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents no. 2 to 7. 2. With the consent of learned counsel appearing on behalf of the contesting parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. 3. At the very outset, Sri Prashant Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner states that as while deciding the representation of the petitioner vide order dated 15.07.2025, a copy of which is annexure 3 to the writ petition made against the transfer order dated 30.05.2025 whereby the petitioner had been transferred from Uttar Pradesh to Punjab, the respondents have again called for the five preferred regions/State other than present State as such, the petitioner intends to give a choice for the five regions/State and prays that the respondents may be directed to sympathetically consider the said choices in accordance with law considering the fact that the petitioner's husband is an All India Service Officer posted in the State of Uttar Pradesh. 4. Sri Anurag Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-Corporation states that once the respondents themselves have asked the petitioner to submit a five choices consequently, in case the petitioner submits her choices within a week from today then the competent authority shall consider the choices which would be considered within next ten days from the date of receipt of five choices of posting from the petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. 5. The aforesaid statement of Sri Anurag Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-Corporation is recorded and the writ petition stands disposed off. Order Date :- 28.7.2025/Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench