SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:10351 (Compounding Appl. No.01 of 2025) with C528 No.940 of 2025 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Prakash Chandra, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. Vikas Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. Susheel Kumar, learned counsel for Respondent No.2. 4. The applicant-Rohit, is currently, in judicial custody in Sub Jail, Roorkee, District Haridwar; he needs to be heard. The Jailer, Sub Jail Roorkee, District Haridwar is directed to facilitate the presence of the applicant Rohit, son of Narendra though V.C. 5. Present Application has been filed by the Applicant under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita BNS 2023 alongwith compounding application and the same is supported with the affidavits of applicant and respondent no.2. 6. By means of this C528 application, applicant, has sought quashing of the Charge Sheet No.408 of 2022 dated 21.05.2022 (FIR dated 25.09.2021 registered as FIR/Case Crime No.894 of 2021), cognizance/summoning order dated 22.06.2022, subsequent proceedings of Session Trial No.71 of 2022 as well as the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.306 of 2022 State vs. Rohit for the offence punishable under Section 304-B IPC registered at P.S. Manglour, District Haridwar pending in the court of learned District & Sessions Judge, Roorkee, District Haridwar. 7. Applicant has made his appearance through V.C. from Sub Jail, Roorkee, District Haridwar; and respondent no.2 is present in the Court. They are being identified by their respective counsels. 8. After interacting with the applicant, with the aid of the Jailer, Sub Jail Roorkee, District Haridwar, and also after interacting with respondent no.2, this Court thinks that the grounds for compounding the matter are sufficient. 9. Learned counsel for the parties have filed their respective affidavits along with the compounding application stating therein that they do not wish to pursue the present criminal case any further and a compromise has been entered between them. 10. Learned State counsel has opposed the compounding application and submits that serious allegations are there, therefore, matter cannot be compounded. 11. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 12. In view of the principle of law laid down by Ho’ble the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303, criminal proceedings can be quashed by this Court, if this Court is satisfied that matter has been settled between the parties amicably and parties are interest to restore peace and harmony between them. 13. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in view of the above, the compounding application is allowed. The entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.306 of 2022 State vs. Rohit for the offence punishable under Section 304-B IPC registered at P.S. Manglour, District Haridwar pending in the court of learned District & Sessions Judge, Roorkee, District Haridwar are hereby quashed. 14. The Jailor, Sub Jail Roorkee, District Haridwar is directed to release the applicant- Rohit forthwith without any condition in case he is not wanted in any other case. 15. Accordingly instant C528 application stands disposed of. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 20.11.2025 Arti