Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15400 (KAR)

L PRADEEP KUMAR v. BALAJI SINGH

WP/3898/2020 · 2025-01-08

Jyoti Mulimani

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:580 WP No. 3898 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 3898 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: L.PRADEEP KUMAR AGED 34 YEARS, S/O M.LAKSHMINARAYANA, RESIDING AT NO.1192, 'NISARGA', 1ST FLOOR, 1ST 'E' MAIN ROAD, 7TH CROSS, 2ND PHASE, GIRINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 085. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. SUZANNE VAZ., ADVOCATE SRI. RAJKUMAR.M.D., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. AZHAR MEER & ADVOCATES ) AND: BALAJI SINGH ADVOCATE, RESIDING AT NO.138, 1ST FLOOR, 2ND MAIN ROAD, SHESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENT THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:580 WP No. 3898 of 2020 ORAL ORDER Smt.Suzanne Vaz., counsel on behalf of Sri.Rajkumar.M.D., for the petitioner has appeared through video conferencing. Counsel submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel Smt.Suzanne Vaz., submits that a conscious decision is taken by her and the petitioner about infructuous of the Writ Petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 1