SHALINEE SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF BAL VIKAS AVAM PUSHTAHAR LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/8180/2025 · 2025-08-01
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153960 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153960 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44692 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8180 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shalinee Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Bal Vikas Avam Pushtahar Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sukh Deo Singh,Maheshwar Mishra,Paritosh Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties 1 to 4. In view order being passed, notice to opposite party No.5 stands dispensed with.
2. Petition has been filed challenging appointment of opposite party No.5, Sangita Tripathi wife of Mahesh Kumar Tripathi on the post of Aganbadi Worker in the centre concerned as per list dated 10th March, 2025.Concomitant prayers including petitioner's selection and appointment on the said post have also been made.
3. Learned State Counsel has been provided written instruction dated 23rd July, 2025, which is taken on record and as per which it has been indicated that percentage of marks obtained by petitioner as well as opposite party No.5 as per intermediate, graduation and post graduation were considered in terms of paragraph 7 of the government order dated 21st March, 2023 was conducted in which the opposite party No.5 obtained 19.218 marks while petitioner obtained 18.721 marks.
4. In view thereof, it is evident that certificates submitted by petitioner as well as the answering opposite parties have been considered on merit basis in terms of the government order whereby opposite party No.5 having obtained higher marks than the petitioner who was considered in the above poverty line, general category since no candidate was available in the below poverty line category.
5. In view thereof, this Court does not find any occasion to grant indulgence, the petition therefore fails and is dismissed. Parties to bear their own cost. Order Date :- 1.8.2025 prabhat Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench