Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43933 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7122 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Bahadur Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Yogesh Kumar Mishra,Dharmendra Kumar Yadav,Shraddha Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State/ respondents no. 1 to 3. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed that a direction be given to respondents no. 2 and 3 (specially respondent no. 3) to comply the order dated 04.12.2024, passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Baldirai, District Sultanpur in Case No. 3966/2024, under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, Ram Bahadur Yadav Vs. Gangaram and others. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the Sub Divisional Magistrate ordered the Revenue Inspector Haliyapur to submit the demarcation report and the Najri Map of the disputed land, on which the Revenue Inspector submitted the demarcation report on 11.07.2024 and the najri map on 03.01.2024. Against the demarcation report, an application for raising objection and making him a party to the case was resented presented by Surendra Kumar before the Sub Divisional Magistrate on 25.10.2024 and this objection was presented that the plot no. 433 is getting affected in the demarcation report, which is the land of the objector. The Sub Divisional Magistrte, Baldirai District Sultanpur, on the basis of merits hearing both the parties on 04.12.2024 and after properly observing the site map, passed the order that the ojector's plot is not being affected by this demarcation report. 4. It has further been submitted that the petitioner is being deprived from his fundamental rights due to illegal interference of the opposite party no.2. 5. Learned Standing Counsel, on the other hand, submits that the petitioner has equally efficacious and alternate remedy of executing the orders of revenue court as per Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual where an order of revenue authority can be executed. 6. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this petition and seeks liberty to approach the competent authority under Para 460 o U.P. Revenue Court Manual for execution of the orders passed by the Prescribed Authority as well as of the other authorities. 7. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach competent authority by moving appropriate application under Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual to execute the orders of the revenue authorities. In case, such an application is moved within two weeks form today, the same shall be disposed of expeditiously. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 30.7.2025 Muk Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench