SUSHEEL KUMAR PANDEY v. ATUL PAL NAYAB TEHSILDAR GONDA DIST. GONDA AND ANOTHER
CAPL/2338/2025 · 2025-09-01
Manish Kumar
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153923 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153923 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2338 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. Learned Standing Counsel has received instruction from the respondent, copy of which has been placed during course of argument, which is taken on record. Learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that in compliance of the judgment and order dated 26.03.2025 passed in Matter Under Article 227 No.1653 of 2025, the case of the applicant filed under Section 34 of U.P. L.A. Act, 1901 has been decided and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous. As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. Notice issued earlier, if any, stand discharged. September 1, 2025 S. Kumar Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ganga Prasad Mishra, Abhinav Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Manish Kumar,J.) Susheel Kumar Pandey .....Applicant(s) Atul Pal Nayab Tehsildar Gonda Dist. Gonda And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench