KRISHNA KUMAR GAUR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND 2 OTHERS
A483/575/2025 · 2025-07-29
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153900 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153900 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43888 Court No. - 29 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 575 of 2025 Applicant :- Krishna Kumar Gaur Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Nazim Ali Siddique,Gurucharan Kashyap,Richa Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Shree Prakash Singh,J.
1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that he is withdrawing the application for interim relief and he is pressing the main relief as is mentioned at page 13. 2. Learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection. 3. The prayer so made, is allowed. 4. The interim relief application allowed to be withdrawn. 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 6. The instant application under Section 483 Cr.P.C./ 529 BNSS has been filed with the following main prayer:-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the learned Additional District Judge/ATS, Lucknow to take coercive action against the opp. parties for not producing the witnesses and accused on the date fixed and expedite the proceedings of Session Trial No.767 of 2016, State Versus Sandeep Kumar Gaur and another and conclude the same within such time bound period as may be deemed fit, just and proper and fixed by this Hon'ble Court, otherwise the petitioner will suffer irreparable loss and injury which cannot be made good in or any event."
7. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the matter is still pending consideration since 2016 and the applicant is suffering due to delay in conclusion of the trial proceedings. He submits that the interest of justice would be subserved if this Hon'ble Court is pleased enough to direct the Court below to conclude the trial proceedings of Session Trial No.767 of 2016 (State Versus Sandeep Kumar Gaur and another) within a stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. 8. The counsel appearing for the State has no objection to the
contention aforesaid. 9.
Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, the Trial Court is hereby directed to conclude the proceeding of Session Trial No.767 of 2016, arising out of case crime No.94 of 2016 under Sections 364, 302, 201 IPC, P.S. Krishna Nagar, District Lucknow, in expedition, if there is no legal impediment, while considering the guidelines and circulars issued in this regard. 10. The application is disposed off accordingly. Order Date :- 29.7.2025 Mohd. Sharif Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench