- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3888 RFA No. 244 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 244 OF 2024 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. HANUMANTHAPPA S/O IRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 2. SMT. SAROJAMMA W/O HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, 3. CHANDRAKANTHA S/O HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 4. HITHESHA S/O HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF SHIGGA VILLAGE, ULAVI HOBLI SORABA TALUK SHIMOGA DISTRICT - 577 434. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI BIMBADHARA M.GOWDA, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. M.SHIVAPPA S/O IRAPPA Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3888 RFA No. 244 of 2024 AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 2. HALESHAPPA S/O IRAPPA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 3. NAGARAJA S/O IRAPPA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 3 ARE RESIDENTS OF SHIGGA VILLAGE, ULAVI HOBLI SORABA TALUK SHIMOGA DISTRICT - 577 434. 4. SMT. HALAMMA W/O DYAVAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/O SHYADALAKOPPA VILLAGE ULAVI HOBLI, SORABA TALUK SHIMOGA DISTRICT - 577 434. 5. SMT. LALITHA W/O PARAMESHAPPA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R/O SAMPALLI VILLAGE ANANDAPURAM HOBLI SAGAR TALUK SHIMOGA DISTRICT - 530 052. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC 1908. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3888 RFA No. 244 of 2024 THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the appellants are not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed before the Registrar (P & H) and sufficient time was granted to comply with the office objections. Thereafter, the appeal was listed before the Court on 13.01.2025, on that day, finally two week's time was granted to comply with the office objections, failing which the appeal was ordered to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non- compliance of office objections' on 28.01.2025 The appeal is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal of appeal for non-compliance of office objections'. Despite granting sufficient time, the office objections are not complied with. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellants are not represented. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:3888 RFA No. 244 of 2024 Hence, the Regular First Appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31