Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43291 Court No. - 13 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6045 of 2025 Applicant :- Sayeed Anwar @ Anwar Ahmad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Kunwar Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. 1. Shri Sudheer Kumar Rawat, Advocate, has put in appearance for the private opposite party nos.2 and 3 and has filed his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. Instant application has been preferred by the applicant for the following main relief(s):- "quash the entire Criminal Proceeding as well as the impugned summoning order dated 10.03.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge (S.C./S.T.) Act, Lucknow, in Session Case No. 2019/2023, (State Versus Sayeed Anwar) arising out of Case Crime No. 137/2022 under sections 323, 504 I.P.C. and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities), Act, 1989, at Police Station- Banthara, District- Lucknow, contained in Annexure No. 2 to this petition. This Hon'ble Court may further be pleased to quash the Charge Sheet No.01/2022 dated 15.05.2022, filed by Investigating Officer in Case Crime No. 137/2022 under sections 323, 504 I.P.C. and Sections 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities), Act, 1989, at Police Station- Banthara, District- Lucknow against the petitioner, which is contained in Annexure No. 1 to this petition." 4. It is stated that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise and a copy of compromise deed, duly signed by the parties, is annexed as Annexure No.4 to the present application. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. 5. It is also stated that offence as indicated under Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of SC/ST Act is not made out. 6. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 7. Considering the aforesaid, this application is disposed of finally in following terms:- (i) The parties to the proceedings in issue shall appear and file the compromise before the concerned court within four week's from today. (ii) If the parties appear before the concerned court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record. (iii) The concerned court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within four weeks from the date of production of copy of this order. (iv) The concerned court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed. (v) It shall be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. (vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise, if any, to the counsel for the applicant, after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned court. (vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. Order Date :- 28.7.2025 Anand/- Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench