IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 8605 of 2025 Date of Decision: 30.05.2025 _______________________________________________________ Deepak Kumar …….Petitioner Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent- State. Mr. Vikrant Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner fairly states that after having considered the representation of the petitioner, respondent-State has suitably adjusted him and as such, present petition has been rendered infructuous and same may be disposed of. Ordered accordingly. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge May 30, 2025 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?