Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15384 (RAJ)

RAKESH SINGH URF ROCKY S/O SHRI PURAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5116/2025 · 2025-04-21

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:16524] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 5116/2025 Rakesh Singh Urf Rocky S/o Shri Puran Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Ramela P.s. Manchtamali District Champawat Uttarakhand ( At Present In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shriram Dhakad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 21/04/2025 1. The second bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.447/2024 registered at Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Jaipur West (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Sections 305(a) & 331(4) of BNS. 2. First bail application of the petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 27.02.2025 with liberty to renew the prayer of bail after submission of result of investigation. Now, charge-sheet has been filed, thus this second bail application has been preferred. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest. Charge-sheet has [2025:RJ-JP:16524] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5116/2025] been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that petitioner is a habitual offender as twenty other cases have been registered against him. 5. I have considered the contentions. 6. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by both the parties, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion; looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the second bail application. 7. This second bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Rakesh Singh Urf Rocky S/o Shri Puran Singh, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first & third week of every month in the [2025:RJ-JP:16524] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5116/2025] concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 9. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 10. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 11. The observation made herein above is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /37