Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1538 (UTT)

VICHITRA MANDAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA2/20/2025 · 2025-03-07

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Second Bail Application No.20 of 2025 Smt. Vichitra Mandal ….....Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent Present:- Mr. Yogesh Pant, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral) Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No. 266 of 2024, under Section 143 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3, 4, 5 & 6 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, Police Station Transit Camp, District Udham Singh Nagar. She has sought her release on bail. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. It is argued that co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail. 4. This fact is admitted by learned State counsel. 5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail. 6. The bail application is allowed. 2 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on her executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Ravindra Maithani, J) 07.03.2025 Jitendra