ISHTIAQ HUSSAIN AND ORS. v. FAROOQ AHMED FAKTOO,SECY.EDUN.AND ORS.
CPSW/2/2013 · 2025-07-28
Ma Chowdhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1538 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1538 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 2/2013
Ishtiaq Hussain & Ors.
….. Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
Farooq Ahmed Faktoo, Secy. Edu. & Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Jagmeet Kour, AC vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M. A. CHOWDHARY, JUDGE
ORDER (28.07.2025)
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. So was the case on the previous dates of hearing. It seems that the grievance of the petitioners stands redressed by implementation of the judgment by the respondents.
Be that as it may, the petition is disposed of and the contempt proceedings are dropped, however, the petitioners shall be at liberty to seek revival of the matter, if cause survives.
(M. A. CHOWDHARY)
JUDGE
Jammu 28.07.2025 Neha-1
Serial No. 20