SHUBHAM TIWARI ( SATYA MEDHA ) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/920/2025 · 2025-07-28
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153789 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153789 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43373 Court No. - 14 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 920 of 2025 Applicant :- Shubham Tiwari ( Satya Medha ) Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Kumar Pandey,Ankit Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.
1. The present bail application has been filed by accused- applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.85/2025, under Sections 191(2), 121(1), 109(1), 115(2), 352, 351(3) of BNS, P.S. Gosainganj, District Ayodhya.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record.
3. A perusal of the record shows that the allegation against the applicant is that he has obstructed Arunesh Tiwari, the concerned Lekhpal and the complainant and have beaten them, the statement of the injured has corroborated the prosecution story.
4. In view of above, it does not appear to be a case of false implication hence, no case for anticipatory bail is made out accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed. Order Date :- 28.7.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench