HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 8219 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Saharsh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Ms Suniti Sachan, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 and 3. With the consent of learned counsels appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being decided There is consensus in the Bar that the matter in issue is squarely covered by judgement of this Court dated 10.3.2025 passed in Writ A No. 6187 of 2024 in re: Jitendra Kandwal vs State of U.P. and others, a copy of which is annexure 2 to the writ petition. Considering the aforesaid consensus, the writ petition is allowed. It is provided that the petitioner would be entitled for benefit of the judgement of this Court in the case ofJitendra Kandwal(supra). September 19, 2025 J. K. Dinkar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mrs.Suniti Sachan, Rishabh Tripathi (Abdul Moin,J.) Sneh Kumar Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench