Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15377 (UTT)

YOGESH KUMAR AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/754/2025 · 2025-05-08

Ravindra Maithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS D- 34 WPSS No. 754 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Harendra Belwal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Narain Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State. Instant petition was decided on 08.05.2025. Now an amendment application has been filed. Heard. The Court wanted to know from the learned counsel for the petitioners as to what difference does it make if it is not amended. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that details with regard to petitioner no. 7 need to be corrected, otherwise there would be incorrect record qua the petitioner no. 7. Amendment application is allowed. Let the amended memo of writ petition be filed by the petitioners within three days. (Ravindra Maithani J.) 09.07.2025 Avneet/