Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 153766 (ALL)

MOHAMMAD IKBAL @ IKBAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER

/966/2025 · 2025-08-05

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45348 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 966 of 2025 Applicant :- Mohammad Ikbal @ Ikbal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arti Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Ms. Arti Shukla, the learned counsel for the applicant states that after filing of the present anticipatory bail application, the applicant has been arrested and the anticipatory bail application has become infructuous. 2. The learned A.G.A has no objection against the aforesaid request made by the learned counsel for the applicant. 3. Accordingly, the application is rejected as having become infructuous. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 5.8.2025 Preeti. Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench