APHC010196442025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: Between: Gonavath Fathima Bai The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): The Court made the following order: Heard Sri N.A.Ramachandra Murthy and learned Government Pleader for Service respondents. 2. Challenging the action notice vide Cr.No.02/RCO requesting the petitioner to submit explanation within 3 days with surprise check conducted on 06 even framing charges, the instant writ petition is filed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that charge memo was issued when the petitioner’s case was under consideration for promotion to the post IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 9951/2025 ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: N A RAMACHANDRA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following order: N.A.Ramachandra Murthy, learned counsel for the and learned Government Pleader for Service-I appearing on behalf of the respondents. Challenging the action of the 2nd Respondent in issuing the impugned notice vide Cr.No.02/RCO-OGL/2022 dt.06.01.2023 against the Petitioner requesting the petitioner to submit explanation within 3 days in connection with surprise check conducted on 06.05.2019 after lapse of 4 years , the instant writ petition is filed. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that charge memo was issued when the petitioner’s case was under consideration for promotion to the post IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3458] THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) N A RAMACHANDRA MURTHY , learned counsel for the petitioner I appearing on behalf of the Respondent in issuing the impugned the Petitioner in connection 2019 after lapse of 4 years, without Learned counsel for the petitioner states that charge memo was issued when the petitioner’s case was under consideration for promotion to the post of Sub Registrar and he would urge that it would suffice, if a direction be given to the respondents to consider his case for promotion in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257 General Administration (Ser.C) Department, dated 10.06.1999. He further relies on the decision of this Court in W.P.No.5271 of 2025 dated 04.03.2025. 4. Learned Government Pleader for Services-I did not dispute the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, without going into merits, the Writ Petition is disposed of, with the consent of both the counsel, at the stage of admission, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner’s case for promotion to the post of Sub Registrar in terms of G.O.Ms.No.257, dated 10.06.1999, if the petitioner is in the zone of consideration and fulfills all requisite qualifications. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 21.04.2025 BSK 79 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 9951/2025 Date: 21.04.2025 BSK