KULDEEP KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/6876/2025 · 2025-08-21
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153704 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153704 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49217 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6876 of 2025 Applicant :- Kuldeep Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Shamshad Ahmad Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Shamshad Ahmad Khan, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Manish Kumar Pandey, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 219 of 2020, under Sections 147, 308, 323, 324, 504, 506 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Mahmudabad, District Sitapur. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 08.06.2020 against five persons, including the applicant stating that all the accused persons entered the informant's house and attacked her father in law due to which he suffered several injuries on his head and he was taken to Community Health Centre from where he was referred to the District Hospital and from the District Hospital he was referred to Lucknow. 4. The injured person was treated in KGMU, Lucknow. The doctor stated that the victim had suffered fracture in skull and he had suffered hemorrhage also. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant a young man aged 26 years and he has
been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant's involvement in another criminal case has been disclosed in the rejoinder affidavit in which he has been enlarged on bail. It has also been submitted on behalf of the applicant that co-accused persons Anil Kumar, Pradeep Kumar and Keshavram have already been enlarged on bail by coordinate Benches of this Court and copies of their bail orders have been annexed with the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. 6. The State has filed a counter affidavit annexing therewith copy of material collected during investigation. 7. The learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. 8.
Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 31.05.2025, whereas three co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10. Let the applicant-Kuldeep Kumar be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by
the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. (Subhash Vidyarthi, J.) Order Date :- 21.8.2025 Ram. Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench