Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 153695 (ALL)

KALI PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. REVENUE U.P. LKO. AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/7010/2025 · 2025-07-22

Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41935-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7010 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kali Prasad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Revenue U.P. Lko. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard. If partition proceedings are pending before S.D.M. under Section 116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, then the petitioner will have to approach the S.D.M. court seeking interim relief in those very proceedings, instead of filing this writ petition. If an application has already been filed in those proceedings, the same would be considered at the earliest say, within one week of the receipt of the certified copy of this order. Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. Let a copy of this order be provided to the learned counsel for the petitioner within twenty four hours from today. [Manish Kumar, J.] [Rajan Roy,J] Order Date :- 22.7.2025 Nitesh Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench