ROSHANI CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY., BAL VIKAS AND PUSTAHAAR LKO AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/8191/2025 · 2025-08-01
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153687 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153687 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44782 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8191 of 2025 Petitioner :- Roshani Chauhan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Bal Vikas And Pustahaar Lko And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishwesh Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties 1 to 4. In view of order being passed, notice to opposite party No.5 stands dispensed with.
2. Petition has been filed challenging selection of opposite party No.5 Tapeshwari Bhargawa wife of Ashok Kumar on the post of Aganwadi Worker in the centre concerned.
3. Primary ground of challenge raised by learned counsel for petitioner is that the said opposite party was overage in terms of government order dated 21st March, 2023 since she was over 35 years of age on the date of application.
4. Learned State Counsel has been provided written instructions dated 28th July, 2025, which is taken on record and as per which the certified high school mark sheet of opposite party No.5 has been brought on record indicating her date of birth as 4th March, 1989.
5. It is thus evident that as on the date of advertisement an application preferred by opposite party No.5, she was well within maximum age of 35 years.
6. Since the aforesaid aspect is the only ground raised for challenge to section and appointment of opposite party No.5, the said ground fails and the writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Parties to bear their own cost. Order Date :- 1.8.2025 prabhat Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench