PATEL ADVANCE JV, A PARTNERSHIP FIRM,NEW DELHI THRU. ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY PUNIT SINGH MALIK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. INFRASTRUCTURE AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT,LKO. AND 3 ORS.
WRIC/7009/2024 · 2025-04-11
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153685 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153685 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20653 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7009 of 2024 Petitioner :- Patel Advance Jv, A Partnership Firm,New Delhi Thru. Its Authorised Signatory Punit Singh Malik Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Infrastructure And Industrial Development,Lko. And 3 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Apoorva Tewari,Saumya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amandeep Singh,Gaurav Mehrotra,Sachin Upadhyay Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard Sri J.N. Mathur, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Apoorva Tewari and Sri Abhishek Khare, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel and Sri Gaurav Mehrotra along with Sachin Upadhyay and Ms. Shreya Agrawal, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties no.3 and 4.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner stating that after an order dated 14.12.2023 was passed in Revision No.7637/77-4-23/67 G.N/20, a decision has been taken by the Board on 15.06.2024 to prefer a review, which according to the petitioner is not maintainable.
3. The issue with regard to the maintainability of a review in the revision proceedings under Section 41 of the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973, is now settled by the decision of the State Government itself taken on 27.03.2025 wherein it has been categorically decided that a review would not lie against an order passed by the revisional authority in exercise of its power under Section 41.
4. In view thereof, the present petition is disposed off holding that the decision to prefer a review would not be acted upon by the respondent-authority, however, they are liberty to take such steps as are available under law. Order Date :- 11.4.2025 akverma Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench