Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15364 (RAJ)

GOPAL S/O RAJENDRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5101/2025 · 2025-06-11

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23066] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5101/2025 Gopal S/o Rajendra, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Ehan, Police Sta- tion Hathras Junction, District Hathras (U.p.) (At Present Con- fined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Adv. with Mr. Sarthak Chobey, Adv. For State(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 11/06/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Gopal S/o Rajendra in FIR No. 82/2025 dated 02.03.2025 registered at Police Station Mantown, District-Sawai Madhopur, whereby the applicant-accused has charged under Section 305(a) of BNS. 2. The applicant Gopal S/o Rajendra was arrested on 23.03.2025 and has in judicial custody since then. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is an innocent person and falsely implicated in the present case. Further, he submitted that the investigation relating to present applicant is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for [2025:RJ-JP:23066] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5101/2025] investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant is required for further investigation, the applicant will be available for such investigation. He also submitted that the trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant in custody. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that there is one more case against the applicant and applicant is a labour class person. He further submitted that no recovery was affected from present applicant, who working as a private teacher in UP. At last, he submitted that applicant was named only on information of other accused Sachin Sharma. 5. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 6. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 4. After registration of FIR on 02.03.2025, police has investigated the matter and on information of accused Sachin Sharma who caught red handed and involvement of present applicant was found by police, police has arrested this applicant and after a charge sheet has already been filed. As per prosecution, there is one more case other than present registered against the applicant. The disposal of case will take its own time, therefore, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, it is appropriate to allow the bail application of this applicant- accused. 7. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Gopal S/o Rajendra is hereby allowed, and the [2025:RJ-JP:23066] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5101/2025] applicant is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial Court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violated of above conditions, the bail granted to applicant-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. 8. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J Tahir/122