Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15364 (JHR)

FURKAN ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3411/2024 · 2025-02-11

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.3411 of 2024 ------ 1. Furkan Ansari, aged about 51 years, S/o-Late Balag Ansari, 2. Safique Ansari, aged about 33 years, S/o-Furkan Ansari, 3. Minaj Ansari, Aged about 22 years, S/o-Furkan Ansari. All are R/o- Village Khijuriya, P.O. & P.S.-Fatehpur, District- Jamtara. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Ashutosh Pd. Joshi, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, Addl.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Nityanand Prasad, Advocate ------ Order No.08 Dated- 11/02/2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No.07 of 2024 instituted under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the husband of the informant by causing injury on his head. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that there is no material in the record to suggests that the victim sustained any grievous injury. It is next submitted that because of monetary dispute persisting between the two families, the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case, to extract money from them. It is also submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jamtara in connection with Fatehpur P.S. Case No.07 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of her family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/