Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15364 (GAU)

SH. P. NYAMBEMO JAMI v. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS.

I.A.(Civil)/2128/2022 · 2025-09-10

Anjan Moni Kalita, Michael Zothankhuma

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010144822022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2128/2022 SH. P. NYAMBEMO JAMI S/O- SHRI PITHUNGO JAMI, R/O- H/NO. 273, UNITED COLONY, WARD NO. 20, HALF NAGARJAN, DIST.- DIMAPUR, NAGALAND- 797112. VERSUS LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS. REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, HAVING ITS CENTRAL OFFICE AT YOGAKSHEMA, JEEVAN BIMA MARG, P.B. NO. 19953, MUMBAI- 400021. 2:THE ZONAL MANAGER LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA 4 CR AVENUE HINDUSTAN BUILDING KOLKATA- 700072. 3:THE SENIOR DIVISION MANAGER (DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY) LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA JORHAT DIVISIONAL OFFICE RAJABARI JORHAT- 785014. 4:M. K. GOGOI ENQUIRY OFFICER ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER (LAND HPF) SR. NO. 330384 LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA DIVISIONAL OFFICE RAJABARI JORHAT PIN- 785014. 5:PRODIP BORAH PRESENTING OFFICER ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER (NB) SR. NO. 338246 Page No.# 2/3 LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA JORHAT DIVISIONAL OFFICE RAJABARI JORHAT- 78501 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR N Z LOTHA, Advocate for the Respondent : MR SISHIR DUTTA (R1-R3), MS. S. MOCHAHARI (R1-R3),MR S DUTTA (R1-R3) Linked Case : SH. P. NYAMBEMO JAMI VERSUS LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS. E ------------ Advocate for : MR N Z LOTHA Advocate for : appearing for LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS. E BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 11.09.2025 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. S. K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 53 days in preferring the review petition. Mr. S. Dutta, learned senior counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned. On considering the submissions of the learned counsels for the parties, we find that sufficient cause for the delay has been made out. Accordingly, the delay of 53 days is condoned. Page No.# 3/3 Registry to register the connected petition and list the same on 14.10.2025. I.A. is accordingly allowed and disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant