SHIVENDRA PRATAP SINGH v. NAIB TEHSILDAR AMANIGANJ, TEHSIL MILKIPUR, AYODHYA AND ANOTHER
A227/4387/2025 · 2025-07-25
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153587 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153587 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42907 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4387 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shivendra Pratap Singh Respondent :- Naib Tehsildar Amaniganj, Tehsil Milkipur, Ayodhya And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Kripa Shankar Shukla,Ramesh Babu Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a prayer has been made for expeditious disposal of Case No. 6571 of 2024, Computerized Case NO. T202404230406571, filed Un/S 34 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Shivendra Pratap Singh Vs. Vimala Devi) pending before respondent No. 1.
4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the aforesaid case is not being decided.
5. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that respondent No. 1 may be directed to decide the aforesaid case in a time bound manner.
6. At this stage, no ground for urgency is made out by the petitioner, hence, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the respondent No. 1 and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of aforesaid, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the respondent No. 1 shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case any case for urgency is made out by the petitioner, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, in accordance with law.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the Court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
8. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 25.7.2025/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench