[2025:RJ-JP:23756] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5124/2025 Jor Singh S/o Rajendra Singh @ Rajveer Singh, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Sonokhar, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg. (Presently The Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5125/2025 Sonu @ Dharmendra Singh S/o Kunwarpal, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Village Sonokhar, Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg. (Presently The Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Surana, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anuj Rohila Mr. Sankalp Sogani Mr. Umang Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 30/06/2025 1. The petitioners have preferred these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0101/2023 registered at Police Station-Jurhera, District-Bharatpur for offences under Sections 143, 323, 341 and 336 of IPC. [2025:RJ-JP:23756] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5124/2025] 2. Since both the bail applications arise out of common FIR, therefore these cases are being decided by a single order. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. He submits that on the same incident the cross FIR has been filed by the complainant also in which the complainant's side have been released on bail by this Court. He further stated that in present case there is no medical opinion by which it can be inferred that the so called injury caused by the present petitioner is dangerous to life. The petitioners are behind the Bar since 21.03.2025. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners- (1) Jor Singh S/o Rajendra Singh @ Rajveer Singh (2) Sonu @ Dharmendra Singh S/o Kunwarpal shall be released on bail on [2025:RJ-JP:23756] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5124/2025] their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Sunita/59-60