PREMLATA AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WPIL/758/2025 · 2025-07-28
Attau Rahman Masoodi, Subhash Vidyarthi
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153550 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153550 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43342-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 758 of 2025 Petitioner :- Premlata And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Phal,Neelam Kumari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The averments made in the present writ petition essentially indicate that the dispute between the parties is civil in nature. For such a grievance, writ proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India may not lie.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is at liberty to initiate
appropriate
proceedings
through Civil/revenue court. In case any such proceedings are initiated, the court concerned shall proceed with the matter in accordance with law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) (Attau Rahman Masoodi,J.)
Order Date :- 28.7.2025 Shahnaz Digitally signed by :- SHAHNAZ BANO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench