Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 153549 (ALL)

SANTOSH KUMAR TIWARI @ SANTOSH TRIPATHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. TEHSILDAR, TEHSIL LALGANJ, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS

A227/4405/2025 · 2025-07-25

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:42794 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4405 of 2025 Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Tiwari @ Santosh Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Tehsildar, Tehsil Lalganj, Pratapgarh And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhishek Mishra,Shubhi Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Jainat Kr. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the State respondent to decide the pending case/proceeding Case NO. 5633/2025 (Computer Case No. T202502570205653) U/S 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901/ 34 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 ( Santosh Kumar Tiwari Vs. Smt. Muniya Devi) expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Lalganj, District Pratapgarh is directed to decide pending case/proceeding Case NO. 5633/2025 (Computer Case No. T202502570205653) U/S 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901/ 34 U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 ( Santosh Kumar Tiwari Vs. Smt. Muniya Devi), expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. . (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 25.7.2025/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench