SMT. MANISHA NAG AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
/6745/2025 · 2025-08-05
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153548 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 153548 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:45549-DB Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6745 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Manisha Nag And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Uday Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for State-respondents and perused the record. 2. This Court has passed order dated 28.07.2025, which reads as under :
"1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A., who appears for the State. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following relief(s):
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the first information report No. 0395 of 2025, under section-87 B.N.S. registered at Police Station- Padua, District-Kheri on dated 19.07.2025 annexed as Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition."
3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners were in affairs and they have married each other on 18.07.2025, but the respondent No. 4 being annoyed lodged the impugned F.I.R.
4. Learned A.G.A. has produced before this Court the instructions sent by Sub-Inspector, Police Station Padua, District Kheri, wherein it has been stated that on statement being recorded of the alleged victim under Sections 180 and 183 of B.N.S.S., the Final Report No. 39/25 has been prepared, which has been submitted before the supervisory authority. 5. At this stage, Sri Ravinder Pandey, who has filed his Vakalatnama today in Court on behalf of opposite party No.4, has made a request to the Court that the parents of the petitioner No.1 want to meet her daughter-petitioner No.1, so as to know her well being. 6. Petitioner No. 2 is directed to produce the petitioner No.1 before this Court on 05.08.2025 at 2.15 p.m.. The parents of the girl i.e. the petitioner No.1 shall also remain present in Court on the next date of listing. 7. List this case on 05.08.2025 at 2.15 p.m."
3. In compliance of the aforesaid order, petitioner no.1 Smt. Manisha Nag, petitioner no.2 Roop Chand and opposite party no.4 Nawal Kishor are present in person. Smt. Pushpa Devi, wife of opposite party no.4 is also present in person.
Petitioner no.1 Smt. Manisha Nag has stated that she has willingly married with petitioner no.2 Roop Chand and presently she is living with him as his wife. She has no grievance against her husband and he is looking after her. Though the parents of petitioner no.1 have raised some objections on the aforesaid marriage but petitioners being major person are free to get married each other and live together. 4. The aforesaid order dated 28.07.2025 reads that final report has been submitted before the Supervisory Authority. However, learned A.G.A. is not aware about the fact as to whether said final report has been sent to the concerning court or not. 5. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the parties who are present in person, we feel that there is no purpose to keep this writ petition pending any longer. Accordingly, this writ petition is
disposed of finally with the direction that if the final report is sent to the concerning court, the aggrieved party may take appropriate steps strictly in accordance with law. Since the opposite party no.4 and his wife have submitted that father of petitioner no.2 is threatening him and his family for dire consequences, he or his family members may take appropriate legal recourse before the concerning authorities, police etc. strictly in accordance with law and it is needless to say that if any genuine and bona fide grievance is raised before the competent authority, the same may be redressed strictly in accordance with law. It is made clear that no person shall create any obstacle or hindrance in peaceful living of petitioners who are husband and wife.
Order Date :- 5.8.2025. Rks. Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench