Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15354 (KAR)

SMT. GULLAMMA v. SRI.M. RAJENDRA

WP/2995/2024 · 2025-01-31

H T Narendra Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4466 WP No. 2995 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2995 OF 2024 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GULLAMMA D/O LATE DODDAKENCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS R/AT DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE MARATHAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560037. 2. SRI SURESH A S/O LATE SUNKAMMA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE MARATHAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560037. 3. SRI PRASHANTH KUMAR S/O LATE SRINIVAS K AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE MARATHAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560037. 4. SMT KAMALAMMA D/O LATE DODDAKENCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS R/AT DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE MARATHAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560037 Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4466 WP No. 2995 of 2024 5. SMT RAMAKKA D/O LATE DODDAKENCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE MARATHAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560037. 6. SMT JAYALAKSHMAMMA D/O LATE DODDAKENCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE MARATHAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560037. 7. SMT NARASAMMA W/O VENKATASWAMY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/AT DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE MARATHAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560037. 8. SRI DILIP KUMAR S/O VENKATASWAMY AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/AT DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE MARATHAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560037. 9. SMT PARIJATHA W/O KRISHNAMURTHY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/AT DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE MARATHAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560037 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIKRAM UNNI RAJAGOPAL.,ADVOCATE) - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4466 WP No. 2995 of 2024 AND: 1. SRI.M. RAJENDRA S/O LATE C MUNIYAPPA AGED MAJOR R/AT DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE MARATHAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560037. 2. SMT M MANJULA D/O LATE C MUNIYAPPA AGED MAJOR R/AT DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE MARATHAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560037. 3. SMT YASHODAMMA D/O LATE C MUNIYAPPA AGED MAJOR R/AT DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE MARATHAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560037. 4. SRI J SRINIVAS S/O GANESH REDDY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE MARATHAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BENGALURU-560037. 5. SRI V M THOMAS S/O LATE MANE AGED MAJOR R/AT CHINNAPANAHALLI VILLAGE K R PURAM HOBLI BENGALURU-560037. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:4466 WP No. 2995 of 2024 6. SRI CHANDAN REDDY S/O G SRINIVASA AGED MAJOR NO.91, 3RD MAIN DODDANEKUNDI VILLAGE HAL MAIN ROAD, VARTHUR HOBLI BENGALURU-560037. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. LATHA S SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R6: NOTICE TO R1 AND R2 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED V/O DATED: 11.03.2024: R1 & R2 ARE LR’S OF DECEASED R3: NOTICE TO R4 IS SERVED: R5 IS DEAD) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO i) CALL FOR THE RECORDS OF OS NO. 226/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE XXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH- 6) AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 09/01/2024 (ANNEXURE-A).ii) ALLOW IA NO. 1 IN OS NO. 226/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE XXIV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-6) (ANNEXURE-J) AS PRAYED FOR BY GRANTING AN ORDER OF TEMPORARY INJUNCTION AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. The learned counsel for respondent No.6 has filed a memo stating that the respondents-defendants have filed an application for rejection of the plaint in O.S.No.226/2024 on the file of XXIV Additional City Civil - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:4466 WP No. 2995 of 2024 and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, and the said application came to be allowed and the suit has been rejected on 22.01.2025. 2. The memo is placed on record. 3. In that view of the matter, prayers sought in the present writ petition do not survive for consideration and hence, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 4. All pending I.As., if any, are dismissed accordingly. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41